UFOs? That's a Good Question, Tim, But I've Got Even Better Ones (Page 1 of 1)

Sen. John McCain got a standing ovation during a debate recently when he said of the peace, love and music festival known as Woodstock, "I wasn't there. I'm sure it was a cultural and pharmaceutical event. I was tied up at the time." That shot across the cultural divide came as McCain was dissing Sen. Hillary Clinton's previous and failed attempt to fund a museum at Woodstock, New York.

The moment comes to mind when I consider the most condescending question asked in any presidential debate this year. Maybe it's because McCain's attack on Woodstock, like Tim Russert's question to candidate Sen. Dennis Kucinich (It's coming, I swear), seems so beside the point. Maybe it's because at the time of the Woodstock festival, McCain was flying high above the rice paddies of North Vietnam in what must've seemed an alien machine to the peasants below, shortly before he was shot down and taken prisoner in North Vietnam. Anyhow, the question Russert asked Kucinich during a recent Democratic debate was this: "Shirley MacLaine writes in her new book that you sighted a UFO over her home in Washington state, that you found the encounter extremely moving, that it was a triangular craft, silent and hovering... Now, did you see a UFO?"

An entertaining exchange ensued, but the short answer was "yes."

Never mind that it's a misleading question. (Can YOU identify everything you ever saw in the sky? If not, then you, too, have seen an unidentified flying object or UFO, my friend. Gee, was that a chicken-hawk shooting past my window just now?)

Never mind 46 percent of Americans say UFOs are real — more than the percentage who "believe in" the War in Iraq.

Never mind that what Kucinich saw was most likely Vice President Dick Cheney's post-apocalypse kandy-kolored tangerine-flake streamline flying getaway gizmo. (OK, I stole some of that from Tom Wolfe.)

Never mind that the question has nothing on Earth to do with the mess we're facing as a species (global warming, nukes, Neocon schemes). It suited Russert's needs. What needs? Why, to humiliate and embarrass Kucinich, of course. Sort of like the lie repeated in our so-called "liberal media" during the 2000 campaign, that former Vice President Al Gore claimed to have invented the Internet. You have to wonder about Russert's motives, especially as he posed his UFO question on the eve of Kucinich's call for a vote on the House floor as to whether Russert's former neighbor, Cheney, should be impeached for lying us into war against Iraq and beating the drums for bombing Iran. Yes, it's a funny question but irrelevant.

Here's what's relevant: Kucinich has been right more than all of the other candidates combined — with the possible exception of Mike Gravel, two-time Senator from Alaska — who also finds himself belittled and shunted aside by the likes of Russert.

Look at all about which Kucinich has been right: there were no WMDs in Iraq;  there were no ties between Saddam Hussein and al-Qaeda; aside from torture being immoral, it has been proven that it manifestly doesn't work (Just Google Ibn al-Shaykh al-Libi.); shock & awe was a criminal and immoral act; invading and occupying Iraq was a terrible idea; Global warming is real, and a government agency to promote peace and conflict resolution, something Kucinich has long advocated, might've prevented several wars past, present and future.

The fact that Kucinich has little or no chance of winning the presidency should not detract from his wisdom regarding the biggest issues of our times. Yet there's Russert, accusing Kucinich of consorting with little green men.

Had Russert — a journalist who allowed Cheney to hype untrue stories on his network TV show — been even-handed throughout the years, I'd write his performance off as one in a long line of gutsy and entertaining lines of questioning.

For instance, had Russert bothered to ask President George W. Bush, just once: "As a self-proclaimed born-again Christian, you've been embraced by the Christian Right. Do you believe God is using you to bring about the Rapture and other End Time events?" A question like that posed, say, in 2000 might've changed the sorry history of the past six years. Or had he asked, in 2004: "President Bush, just what did you mean when you said, 'We got an issue in America. Too many good docs are getting out of the business. Too many OB/GYNs aren't able to practice their, their love, with women all across the country.'?" Or, during the 2000 Gore vs. Bush election debacle, had Russert asked anyone who would listen, "What about the over-votes? The ballots that include both a check mark and a written-in name? Is it true that these votes — should the Supreme Court allow them to be counted — would go four-to-one in Gore's favor?"

It's not too late for Russert to redeem himself. Here's what I hope he'll ask McCain if he gets a chance: "You received a standing ovation for slamming Woodstock, yet a recent online article asserts that the Woodstock sensibility saved your life by pressuring the government to end the bombing and withdraw from Vietnam. (See my Nov. 9 blog post at Knoxvoice.com) “Which do you find more absurd? That thousands of young people who'd never even met all got high together and fell in love with humankind? Or that you flew high up in a triangular-shaped flying object, spawned from the belly of the military-industrial complex and turned possibly thousands of people you'd never even met into toast?"

There are questions, and then there are questions.

* The views expressed in Commentary do not necessarily reflect those of Knoxville Voice.